<?xml version="1.0" encoding="gb2312"?>

<!-- RSS generated by oioj.net on 4/16/2004 ; 感谢LeXRus提供 RSS 2.0 文档; 此文件可自由使用，但请保留此行信息 --> 
<!-- Source download URL: http://blogger.org.cn/blog/rss2.asp       -->
<rss version="2.0">

<channel>
<title>P2P网络安全</title>
<link>http://blogger.org.cn/blog/blog.asp?name=clarensis</link>
<description>Cla的博客</description>
<copyright>blogger.org.cn</copyright>
<generator>W3CHINA Blog</generator>
<webMaster>webmaster@blogger.org.cn</webMaster>
<item>
<title><![CDATA[Dave Patterson's Writing Advice]]></title>
<link>http://blogger.org.cn/blog/more.asp?name=clarensis&amp;id=9888</link>
<author>clarensis</author>
<pubDate>2005/11/15 15:12:05</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<A><FONT size=1>　</FONT></A><FONT size=1>Dave Patterson's Writing Advice<BR>My first advice is to read aloud what you have written. Generally your ear is<BR>better than your eyes, and if you read it aloud you are much more likely to find<BR>awkward sentences, bad tenses, and other errors.<BR>I find many people are good at sentences, but less good at forming paragraphs.<BR>Ousterhout has a solid rule, which led me to write shorter paragraphs. A<BR>paragraph is about a single idea, with a single key topic sentence. This<BR>sentence is almost always the first, but sometimes the last sentence of the<BR>paragraph, and the rest of the sentences somehow support that topic sentence. If<BR>it works, you can get a quick summary of a section just by reading the topic<BR>sentences.<BR>I get most of my specific advice from Strunk and White, "Elements of Style",<BR>which I call "S&amp;W," I try to read it every few years to learn things. I'll quote<BR>from it here on common errors I find in grad student writing. (The proper<BR>citation is "The elements of style," by William Strunk, Jr. ; with revisions, an<BR>introduction, and a chapter on writing by E.B. White ; [foreword by Roger<BR>Angell]. 4th ed. Boston : Allyn and Bacon, c1999. xviii, 105 p. ) My most recent<BR>incite is to use the Grammar Checking in M/S Word 98. I did this in my chapters<BR>for the 3/e of CA:AQA, which consisted of copying and pasting the text from<BR>Framemaker into Word. To turn on the tool, check the "Check grammar" box and<BR>then click on options. I selected "Technical" for Writing style (which was at<BR>the bottom of the menu, with the default being casual); I think this was<BR>important, as it was much more helpful after I selected this option. (I turned<BR>off the spelling checking since it was spell checked in Frame.) I then selected<BR>"Settings" to see what I wanted it to check. It found passive voice problems,<BR>too long setences, and verb-noun tense problems among other problems. Many of<BR>the issues listed below are checked in Word. It really helped.<BR><BR><BR>a.. Active voice: (S&amp;W rule 14) For example, use "Figure X shows ..." rather<BR>than "... as shown in Figure X."<BR>Also, it is much better to mention a Figure that summarizes a lot of information<BR>early in a paragraph rather than go into details and mention the figure at the<BR>end, as early mention gives the reader a framework to refer to while reading the<BR>text.<BR><BR><BR>a.. Ambiguous use of pronoun "This" to summarize sense of previous sentence.<BR>(S&amp;W page 16)<BR>The writing is virtually always clearer if you sane for every occurrence of<BR>"This" (case sensitive) or "This is" and put a noun after "This" to make it<BR>clear what you are referring to. I'll find sentences where I'm not really sure<BR>what I meant, which must make it harder for the reader! So search for "This " in<BR>your text to see if a noun follows.<BR><BR><BR>a.. "While" instead of "and", "but", "although". (S&amp;W pages 63-64)<BR>In general while should be used only in the strict sense of "during the time<BR>time"; S&amp;W give several better ways to convey the same message. So search for<BR>"While " in your text to see if the sentence is about time, or could be replaced<BR>with "Although".<BR><BR><BR>a.. A single numbered subsection<BR>Its strange to have a single subsection (e.g., 5.2.1 in section 5.2). Why do you<BR>need to number it if there is only one? Either eliminate the single subsection,<BR>or change the part that precedes the subsection into a second subsection<BR><BR><BR>a.. Refering to Chapters, Figures, Tables.<BR>Its not a easy to understand rule, but normally these names are capitalized when<BR>used to refer to a specifuc number. So its Chapter 1, Table 3.1, Figure 1.2. I<BR>have seen some people not capitalize section 1, but I don't understand the logic<BR>behind it, so I'd capitalize it also.<BR><BR><BR>a.. Little things: label percentages in tables with %, dollars in tables with $<BR><BR>Its much easier to look at a list of numbers that are percetages and immediately<BR>realize that its a column of percetages if every number has a % after it, vs.<BR>just labeling the column as Percent. No one will be confused that this is<BR>percent of a percent of if you do both. Similar arguments for prices and $.<BR><BR><BR>a.. Numbers spelled out vs. numerical.<BR>The general rule of thumb is to spell out one to ten and use numbers for numbers<BR>for 11 and up. However, I find its much better to consistently use numbers when<BR>the reader might naturally compare or do arithmetic with the numbers with a<BR>sentence or a paragraph. For example, " The 8-processor case (model 370) needs<BR>only 4 computers to hold 32 processors. " Blindly following the rule of thumb<BR>would change the sentence to " The eight-processor case (model 370) needs only<BR>four computers to hold 32 processors. " Its easier to read and understand we use<BR>numbers (8*4=32) instead of words (eight*four=32).<BR><BR><BR>a.. In case you are not familiar, learn about INSPEC from MELVYL so as to make<BR>it MUCH easier to get proper citations. I would adopt its citation style to<BR>reduce the amount of typing.<BR><BR>If you would like more writing advice, other books are:<BR>a.. Frederick Crews and Sandra Schor, "The Borzoi Handbook for Writers (2nd<BR>edition)", Alfred A. Knopf Inc., 1989.<BR><BR>a.. Linda Flower, "Problem Solving Strategies for Writing (3rd edition)",<BR>Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1989.<BR>There are probably newer editions of these books.</FONT>]]></description>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[P2P安全方面的文章]]></title>
<link>http://blogger.org.cn/blog/more.asp?name=clarensis&amp;id=9881</link>
<author>clarensis</author>
<pubDate>2005/11/15 13:18:38</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[<P><U><FONT color=#800080><A href="http://bbs.w3china.org/list.asp?boardid=57">http://bbs.w3china.org/list.asp?boardid=57</A></FONT></U></P>
<P><U><FONT color=#800080>空间太小了，只好给出链接，需要更多的资料，关注我或回复吧。</FONT></U></P>]]></description>
</item><item>
<title><![CDATA[我的研究方向与兴趣]]></title>
<link>http://blogger.org.cn/blog/more.asp?name=clarensis&amp;id=9879</link>
<author>clarensis</author>
<pubDate>2005/11/15 12:08:12</pubDate>
<description><![CDATA[
<P>我这边的研究方向与兴趣主要包括：</P>
<P><BR>P2P安全方面的工作主要是P2P网络恶意信息发现追踪，P2P蠕虫建模以及P2P网络信息扩散能力分析等。<BR>P2P测量方面的工作主要是Gnutella网络的拓扑发现与分析。</P>
<P>欢迎各位与我讨论相关的研究内容。我在这里新建了个Blog，希望各位可以到那里去发表论点（它现在还空着）。</P>
<P>另外，我的QQ是1112787，不聊天的，请主名P2P安全并说明您的研究兴趣，谢谢阿！</P>]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>